As the trial of Gwyneth Paltrow vs. Terry Sanderson, a retired optometrist, entered its sixth day, the anticipation in the courtroom was palpable. All eyes were fixed on the Hollywood star as she took to the witness stand to testify about the ski crash incident that had landed her in hot water. The case, which has been making headlines since it was filed against Paltrow in 2019, has garnered significant media attention and public interest. As Paltrow’s testimony unfolded, the tension in the room only continued to rise, with everyone waiting to see what new information or details would emerge. Join FactsVerse as we delve into the latest developments of this high-profile case
How it all started
The famous Hollywood actress, Gwyneth Paltrow, has found herself embroiled in a legal battle with retired optometrist Terry Sanderson over a skiing accident that occurred in February 2016 at Deer Valley Resort. Sanderson filed a lawsuit against Paltrow in January 2019, alleging that she collided with him from behind while skiing with an instructor on a beginner-level slope. He also claimed the ski instructor filed a misleading report that exonerated Paltrow of causing the collision, which he contested.
Paltrow’s representative has vehemently denied these accusations, calling the lawsuit “completely without merit.” Paltrow filed a countersuit a month after the incident, alleging that Sanderson was the one who hit her from behind, and that he was trying to take advantage of her celebrity status and wealth.
The lawsuit initially sought damages of $3.1 million, but a judge later ruled that Sanderson could only sue for $300,000. Meanwhile, Paltrow is countersuing for just $1 and attorney fees. Nevertheless, the case has garnered significant media attention, with many people eager to hear what really happened on the slopes that day.
The Beginning Of Trial
The trial began on March 21, 2023, with opening statements from lawyers on both sides. The crux of the matter is whether Paltrow or Sanderson had the right of way while skiing. Ski etiquette dictates that the skier further down the mountain has the right of way, but both sides claim that they were the downhill skier.
Sanderson’s attorney, Lawrence Buhler, informed the jurors that it was the responsibility of skiers to yield the right of way to skiers below them when skiing down the mountain. He also added that this was common knowledge among all skiers. Meanwhile, Paltrow’s lawyer, Stephen Owens, contended that while skiing, the actress noticed two skis appearing between her skis and a man coming up closely behind her. This leads Paltrow to believe someone attacks her during the incident.
Before the jury was sworn in, Judge Kent R. Holmberg established that the jury would not hear arguments concerning Sanderson’s claim of a “hit-and-run” in the original 2019 lawsuit. The trial expects to continue for several weeks, and the outcome remains uncertain.
The trial proves that Gwyneth Paltrow is an extremely hilariously rich celebrity.
The skiing accident that occurred at Deer Valley’s Bandana beginner slope has taken a back seat to a more significant story – Gwyneth Paltrow’s testimony during cross-examination. Paltrow is being accused by Sanderson and his legal team of being an out-of-touch celebrity who used ski professionals to cover up her recklessness. Her responses are drawing scrutiny for their frankness and honesty.
Paltrow’s responses to questions about her life and the skiing accident have surprised many people. There was an expectation that she would attempt to come off as a more relatable, sympathetic character, but instead, she has chosen to respond candidly. As a seasoned performer and Oscar-winning actress, she knows how to work a crowd and is not afraid to speak her mind.
Gwyneth Paltrow Frankness
However, her frankness has served as a stark reminder that celebrities are not like the rest of us, despite what we might hear on social media.
When asked by Sanderson’s attorney, Kristin VanOrman, about how the collision affected her, Paltrow responded with a deadpan expression, saying that she lost half a day of skiing. For Sanderson, the impact was much more severe, as he claimed serious bodily harm and a traumatic brain injury, which he believes has altered the trajectory of his life.
VanOrman continued to question Paltrow about her symbolic $1 damages claim, which mirrors a similar case that Taylor Swift won in 2017. VanOrman asked whether the gesture was because Paltrow was friends with Swift, which led to objections from Paltrow’s lawyer. However, the question was allowed, and Paltrow responded that while they were friendly, they don’t talk very often, and she wouldn’t consider them good friends.
Small But Mighty
During the cross-examination, Sanderson’s attorney posed a question to Paltrow that drew the most attention. He asked Paltrow whether she yelled at Sanderson when he was lying on the ground, to which Paltrow responded with a straight face that he skied directly into her back. She continued to explain that she was yelling at him, with her face sharpening at the word “yelling.”
VanOrman later delved into Paltrow’s physical appearance, asking about her height. Sanderson’s attorney initially described the actress as “small but mighty,” but later corrected herself by stating that Paltrow was “not that small.” The comment, coupled with Paltrow’s chuckle through pursed lips, added another layer of intrigue to the already high-profile case. It’s important to note that Paltrow’s slender figure has been discussed in the media, and this remark just served to stoke the flames.
The answers provided by Paltrow raise the question of how much the case is worth to her. The $300,000 that Sanderson is asking for is a drop in the bucket for an actress who owns a lifestyle brand, Goop, worth an estimated $250 million. On top of that, Paltrow’s fashion choices during the trial only served to emphasize her status as an A-lister. She dressed to impress in a chic ski outfit consisting of a chunky white turtleneck, a double-breasted gray suit, and a black collared top with a subtle puffed sleeve. Her attire screams glamour and luxury, underscoring her status as one of Hollywood’s elite.
Who skied into who
The trial in Park City is a legal battle between Gwyneth Paltrow and Terry Sanderson to determine who hit whom on the slopes of the Deer Valley ski resort on February 26, 2016. Sanderson and Paltrow both claim that the other skier crashed into their back and that they were further down the slope. However, the physical reality of humans having only one front side and one back side makes it difficult for both of their accounts to be true.
Sanderson’s lawsuit alleges that Paltrow was skiing “out of control” and slammed into him, causing four broken ribs, a brain injury, and other severe injuries. His legal team claims that Paltrow committed a hit-and-run by speeding off after the incident and that her ski instructor, Eric Christiansen, filed a false report about what happened.
Gwyneth Paltrow And Lawrence D. Buhler
In his opening statement, Sanderson’s lawyer, Lawrence D. Buhler, described his client as charming and outgoing before the crash. Since then, he’s been a different person, no longer exhibiting his previous character traits.
Paltrow’s lawyers, on the other hand, filed a countersuit claiming that Sanderson hit her from behind while skiing on an easier slope called the “Bandana” around 11:55 am that day. Paltrow said she did not see or hear him coming and that Sanderson explained that he had not seen her while skiing. After the crash, which Paltrow describes as a full-body impact, she quit skiing for the day, even though it was still morning.
The incident report filed by Christiansen states that Sanderson claimed that Paltrow “appeared” right in front of him, and he apologized for the collision. Moreover, Craig Roman, a member of Sanderson’s ski group, testified that Sanderson told him that he was fine after the incident.
National Ski Areas Association
The real point of contention in this trial is which party was downhill at the time of the collision, as per the safety code of the National Ski Areas Association. This code dictates that people downhill have the right of way and that the person uphill must avoid them. Paltrow argues that she had not seen Sanderson before the collision, indicating that he hit her from behind and was thus uphill. On the other hand, Sanderson claims that Paltrow hit him and that a false report was made.
The legal battle has now boiled down to a matter of principle, with Paltrow countersuing for $1 and seeking to cover the legal fees associated with the case. Meanwhile, Sanderson is seeking $300,000 in damages. The trial featured around 20 witnesses, including medical experts and Paltrow’s children, Apple and Moses, who will testify. Despite the outcome being uncertain, the spectacle of the trial has taken center stage, drawing attention from around the world.
Testimonies from Paltrow’s children
In the ongoing trial to determine fault for a collision on the slopes of Deer Valley ski resort in February 2016, the testimonies of witnesses and evidence presented are key to establish the truth. On the sixth day of the trial, lawyers read out the verbatim depositions of Paltrow’s children, daughter Apple and son Moses. Although they were ready to testify in court, the lawyers decided to admit the portions read aloud into evidence due to scheduling conflicts and a time crunch.
When Apple’s deposition was read aloud, it was revealed that she did not see the collision take place, but heard a woman’s scream behind her.
Apple And Paltrow
As per Apple’s deposition read aloud in court during the trial, she recounted how her mother explained the incident to her and her brother during lunch. Apple noticed her mother’s shocked demeanor and asked what had happened. In response, Paltrow allegedly said, “This A-hole ran into me. He ran right into my back.” Apple went on to describe the motion her mother made to illustrate how the collision occurred, and how both skiers went down.
Apple also testified that Paltrow was in a state of shock and pain, which was unusual for her.
According to Apple’s deposition, her mother was visibly upset and in a state of shock after the incident. This was not a usual occurrence as Paltrow typically skis for the entire day without taking any breaks. Apple stated that her mother decided to quit skiing for the day because she was in pain and shock.
While the depositions of Paltrow’s children may provide some insight into the events that took place on the day of the collision, they are only a one part piece of evidence in the trial.
There you have it. It’s now time to hear from you. Let us know what your favourite part of the video was.
